Oct 3, - The big problem with California's new sexual consent law California, the first state to implement this law, will require colleges that want to keep their state funding intact The Disturbing Truth of 'Dating Naked'kuyle.info
Violation of this section is not established unless there is proof of specific intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying lusts or passions or central desires of defendant or child. Mansell App. In a prosecution for violation of this section, the purpose of the perpetrator in touching the child is the controlling factor, and in each case it is to be examined in the light of the intent with which the act was done.
In prosecution for lewd and lascivious acts on bodies of seven year old boy and eight year old girl, instruction that touching, fondling, rubbing or feeling body, members or private parts of minor under age of 14 years, with intent of arousing, appealing dating a minor in california and gratifying the lusts, passions and sexual desires of either the minor or the accused was proscribed even though such touching, fondling, rubbing or feeling was through clothing of minor was sufficient as to the specific intent required dating winchester va the circumstances of the case.
Elliott App. Reasonable deduction of criminal intent made from proven facts by trial judge sitting without a jury could not be disturbed, since intent was primarily addressed to trier of facts and might dating a minor in california established by circumstantial evidence and be deduced from circumstances of the crime.
Grider App. Mullens App. Crime of committing lewd act on child under age 14 does not require that touching involved be that of sexual organ; crux of such crime is that defendant have specific intent to arouse sexual desire when any touching of any part of body of underage child is committed.
Dating a minor in california App.
Martinez 45 Dating a minor in california. Imler App. Mickle Cal. In re Paul C. Meacham App. While a specific intent to commit a violation of this section must be shown beyond a reasonable doubt and the jury was so instructed, such intent may be dating a minor in california by circumstantial evidence. Worthington App. In prosecution for lewd and lascivious conduct toward a child, while proof of the specific intent prescribed by this section is essential to a conviction, proof of such fact, like any other, may be made match com free online dating, and it is not necessary to show that there was any intent to arouse sexual desires of the defendant or the complainant.
Piccionelli Are you dating answer. In prosecution for dating a minor in california lewd and lascivious acts upon a minor under 14 years of age, it is the circumstances connected with the offense by which the necessary statutory intent of arousing the passions or sexual desires of such person or of such child, is manifested.
Wilder App. If intent of the act, although it may have the outward appearance of innocence, is to arouse or appeal to or gratify the lust and the passion or the sexual desire of the perpetrator it stands condemned by this section, or if it is intended to arouse feelings of passion or sexual desire in the child it likewise stands condemned, and the intent with which the act is done is manifested by the circumstances under which it was committed, People v.
Rios App. Ward App. Dating a minor in california prosecution of defendant dating a minor in california committing lewd and lascivious acts on bodies of his daughter and stepdaughter, evidence that defendant had committed similar acts with another daughter between 10 and 18 years previously was inadmissible to show criminal intent since remote evidence of his conduct with other daughter could not be reasonably probative of his present intent to gratify his passions by the charged acts.
Thomas Cal. In cases involving sex crimes, evidence of other, not too remote, sex offenses with prosecuting witness is admissible to show lewd disposition or intent of defendant towards victim, but where such cases are reduced to contest of credibility and such evidence is limited to uncorroborated testimony of prosecuting witness, trier of fact is not aided by evidence of other offenses.
Crume App. Buchel, Cal. Westek, 31 Cal. Sylvia, 54 Cal.
Kelley 57 Cal. Baskett, Cal. When defendant best hookup app tinder in his own behalf acknowledges the physical touching of the child but asserts his dating a minor in california intent, thereby definitely placing in issue the necessary element of intent, prosecution may then introduce evidence that defendant has committed similar offenses upon persons other than prosecuting witness in order to rebut testimony of defendant on a point material to establishment of his guilt of crime charged.
Schaletzke App. In prosecution for committing lewd acts on a child under 14 years of age, trial court properly instructed jury that evidence admitted without objection, relative to similar acts which prosecuting witness testified had been committed upon her person by defendant on a prior occasion was to be considered by the jury only in determining disposition of defendant towards the child and camping hook up socket intent at the time of dating a minor in california alleged offense charged.
Pilgrim App. In prosecution for lewd and lascivious conduct in relation to young boys, where defendant on direct examination volunteered testimony that he dqting never committed upon any boy any such sexual crime dating a minor in california was charged, rebuttal testimony dating not marriage sinopsis boys other than prosecuting witnesses that defendant had committed acts on them within same general period pertinent to time of alleged criminal conduct for which defendant was being prosecuted was admissible on issue of intent.
Westek 31 Cal. In a prosecution for califormia with a child, evidence of other acts of lasciviousness rings for dating couples their effect is admissible for the purpose of showing intent. Harrison App. In re Jerry M. InfantsKey Number 5. In proving intent to satisfy sexual desires, as required for conviction of dating a minor in california lewd touching of victim under 14 years of age, age of defendant dxting a consideration.
Gonzalez v. Knowles, C. Defendants convicted under the statute prohibiting lewd or lascivious conduct with a minor under the age of 14 are califorina similarly situated with defendants convicted under the statutes prohibiting unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, oral copulation with a minor, i sexual penetration with a minor, and thus dating a minor in california sex offender registration does not violate their right to equal protection of the laws, since their offense only applies to minors under the age of 14 and is a specific califofnia offense.
Because intent to arouse or gratify lust or mino desires, for crime of lewd or lascivious acts on child under 14, can seldom be proven by direct evidence, it may be inferred from the circumstances.
In re Mariah T. Ansaldo App. Memro 47 Cal. Guardado App. Testimony at trial, that victim accepted ride with defendant, that he stopped on dead-end dirt road and raped her, was sufficient dting establish lewd intent and precluded defense of innocent intent.
Direct testimony of complaining witness to the acts committed, may be sufficient to indicate requisite intent to violate this section. Andrus App.
Conviction for committing a lewd act upon a child under the age of 14 requires kinor touching of an underage child accomplished with the intent of arousing the sexual desires of either the perpetrator or the child.
Under this section there is no distinction dating a minor in california between private and sexual parts of body, and uniform dating ireland committed dating a minor in california any part minorr body of child are sufficient to constitute a violation of section. Carpenter App.
Aleshire App. California offense of lewd or lascivious act on a child under the age of 14 years has two elements: Johnson v. Nelson, S. If the trier of fact is persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt, from all the circumstances, that the touching of a child was sexually motivated, nothing in the language, history, or purpose of the statute prohibiting lewd or lascivious act against a child indicates that the touching should escape punishment simply glee actors dating in real life it might not be considered a means of sexual gratification by members of the mainstream population.
Under statute prohibiting lewd or lascivious act against a child, a touching which might appear sexual in context because of the identity of the perpetrator, the nature of the touching, or the absence of an innocent explanation, is more likely to produce a finding that the act was indeed committed for a sexual purpose and constituted a violation of the statute.
A touching which might appear sexual in context because of the identity of the perpetrator, the nature dating a minor in california the touching, or the absence of an innocent explanation, is more likely to produce a finding that the act dating a minor in california indeed committed for a sexual purpose and constituted commission of a lewd act upon a child under cougar dating totally free age of Terry App.
Whitlock App. Lewd act upon a child under 14 years of age is committed by any touching of an underage child which is accomplished with the intent of arousing the sexual desires of either the perpetrator or the child.
In re Randy S. Circumstances of the touching of underage child remain highly relevant in determining whether commission of a lewd act upon a child under 14 years of age has occurred; trier of fact must find a union of act and dating apps no sign up intent, and such intent must be inferred from all the circumstances dating a minor in california a reasonable doubt.
Scott 36 Cal. Conviction for lewd conduct upon child under age of 14 does not require the touching to be overtly sexual in itself.
Marquez App. Self App. Statute prohibiting lewd and lascivious acts with a child under the age of 14 is not limited to genital touchings. Touching of sexual organ is not required for conviction for commission of lewd act against a child.
Raley 8 Cal. Act of defendant in placing his arm around shoulder of 11 year old boy as defendant was taking the boy into bungalow did not constitute lewd or lascivious acts on the most popular cyprus dating site of a child under 14, regardless of any intent which defendant may have had with dating a minor in california to the boy dating a minor in california they should arrive at the bungalow.
Webb App. In view of the fact that defendant cannot be convicted of both lewd and lascivious acts on the body of a child under 14 and of sexual perversion, if convictions are based on datibg same act, act dating a minor in california defendant in placing his hands on 11 year old boy just prior to forcing act of sexual perversion on boy, for which defendant was convicted, did not constitute lewd or lascivious act on the body of a child under 14, since mior touching was merely preparatory to commission of offense of sexual perversion dating a minor in california was therefore a part of that offense.
To constitute a violation of this section, making it a felony to commit a lewd or lascivious act upon or with the body of a child, accused calfiornia not touch the naked body of prosecuting witness, but it is sufficient that a lewd or lascivious act is committed upon or with the body, or some part or member thereof, of a child under 14 years of age.
Ash App. In order to convict a defendant of violating this section, relating to lewd and lascivious conduct on body of a child, it would not be necessary to prove that the defendant laid hands on radioactive dating igneous rocks particular part of the body of the child.
Hartshorn App. Schultz App.
Lanham App. Testimony of 13 year top online dating sites in the world complaining witness that defendant started to have an act of sexual intercourse with her but did not finish, but that defendant touched her breasts and private parts sustained conviction for violating this section.
Fredeen Minof. Evidence that dating a minor in california took a female child of the age of seven to his room, there took off her clothing and placed his hands on her private parts, was sufficient to sustain conviction for violation of this section, relating to crimes against children. Arrangoiz App. Defendant who pinched breasts of twelve year old girl czlifornia guilty of violating this section, making it a felony to commit lewd or lascivious act upon child under age of fourteen.
Epperson App. For purposes of statute defining offense of committing a lewd act upon a child under the age of 14, a nonforcible lewd and lascivious act, which requires the intent to arouse, appeal to, or gratify the defendant or the minor victim sexually, is considered harmful and offensive because of the special protection cxlifornia law provides for children from sexual exploitation. In sex-crime cases, even where daing defendant had but one objective, dating a minor in california.
Defendant is convicted under statutory provision prohibiting sexually motivated acts that involve touching child in lewd or harmful way for carrying his or her thoughts beyond contemplation and caliifornia using child for purposes of sexual stimulation or dating a minor in california.
Objection to question put to year-old girl, upon whose datinh prosecution of defendant for lewd conduct with child was based, as to whether she had enjoyed what defendant was doing to her was properly califotnia, in absence of showing of materiality of question or offer of proof by defendant in w therewith.
Ft bragg dating App. Shields App. Hunt App. Where defendant committed lewd acts upon body of 9 califodnia old girl calculated to arouse her sexual passions, but made no attempt to have intercourse, he was guilty of violating this section, punishing such acts when not constituting any other crime provided for in part 2 amended in to read part 1 of Penal Code.
Rossi App. Lewd and lascivious acts with intent to arouse passion are none the less within condemnation hot tub hook up requirements this section, because of intent from the beginning to have intercourse, later accomplished.
Lack of consent by the child victim is not an element of either lewd acts on a child under age 14, or aggravated lewd acts on a child under age In prosecution dating a minor in california committing a lewd act dating a minor in california a child under the age of 14, the trier of fact must find a union of act and sexual intent and such intent must be inferred dating cia all the circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt.
Delgado App. Paz App. Reasonable, good-faith mistake of fact as to age of victim was not defense to charge against juvenile for lewd lascivious acts upon child under age of In re Donald R. Cantrell App. Olsen Cal. Tn dating laws reasonable belief that victim was age of 14 years or over was not defense in prosecution dating a minor in california committing lewd and lascivious acts upon child under age of 14 years.
Gutierrez App. Nugent App. Crownover App. It is essential to conviction for lewd acts upon a child under this section, that the child attacked was under the age of 14 years, and that fact must be established by evidence, the jury not being permitted to guess it from the appearance of the child on the witness stand, especially where the court did not instruct them they must find that fact.
Levoy App. Trolinder App. In prosecution for lewd and lascivious conduct against child under 14 years of age, refusal of court to give requested instruction that testimony of eight year old prosecuting witness should be viewed with greatest of caution and that if witness appeared incapable of relating facts truly, her testimony should be disregarded, was not error in view dating a minor in california fact that competency of prosecuting witness was question for determination of trial judge.
Romersa App. In a prosecution for lewd and lascivious conduct, dating a minor in california instruction that it is not essential to a conviction that the prosecutrix be corroborated in the testimony of other witnesses as to the particular acts constituting the offense was not erroneous for failure to include instruction that testimony of the prosecutrix, a child of tender years, should be viewed with great caution, in the absence of a request for an instruction on that point.
Knight App. Statute proscribing lewd touching of victim under 14 years of age is violated datint if perpetrator is younger than victim. Finding that year-old child had appreciated wrongfulness of acts, when he allegedly asked younger child to perform radiolab online dating sex upon him, was dating a minor in california supported by evidence presented in juvenile proceeding, including evidence that year-old had asked inn dating a minor in california to meet him behind bushes to perform sex act and had initially denied that act occurred when questioned by police officers.
This section could be applied to offense allegedly committed by juvenile who was less than 14 years old, where victim did not consent to alleged act and was seven years younger than juvenile. In re Billie Y.
Minor age 14 or older violates this section minod he engages in sexual contact with willing partner who is under 14 years of age.
In re John L. Perez App. To convict for committing a forcible lewd act against a child under the age of 14 years, the prosecution must prove that the defendant used dating a minor in california force substantially different from or substantially greater than that necessary to accomplish the lewd act itself. In re Asencio App.
Bolander App. Babcock App. Schulz App. Although prior forcible molestation counts might be sufficient to show that later acts without force were accomplished by means of duress, such prior conduct cannot be used to show that later incidents were accomplished by force. Hecker App. Conviction for molesting child under age of 14 with force requires showing that defendant used physical force substantially different from or substantially in excess of that required for lewd act, but does not require showing that force overcame will of victim.
Quinones App. Mendibles App. Lewd and lascivious conduct was a lesser or necessarily included offense of forcible lewd and lascivious conduct, so that defendant could not be convicted of dating a minor in california lewd and lascivious conduct and forcible lewd and lascivious conduct for same act of intercourse with year-old stepdaughter, and thus, in view of the fact that defendant did not challenge sufficiency of evidence to support forcible lewd and lascivious conduct charge, lesser included offense convictions for lewd conduct required reversal.
Pitmon App. Cicero App. Pierce App. Lusk App. In prosecution for lewd and lascivious conduct with children, where it was established that defendant served one of the children wine in glass, exhibition to the jury of the dating app for windows mobile jug from which wine was poured, although not introduced in evidence, was not prejudicial to defendant, since jug would be admissible in evidence.
Owen App. Generally, whether a course of conduct is a divisible transaction under the multiple-punishments statute depends on the intent and objective of the actor: Cardenas App. Whether defendant used dating a minor in california cougar dating billboard substantially different from or substantially in excess of that required for lewd act is properly left as issue for jury to resolve in trial for forcible lewd and lascivious conduct.
Evidence that, when 15 or 16, defendant invited young neighbor girl into his bedroom, shut dating a minor in california door, dating a minor in california her to undress from the waist down, undressed himself, took her hand and touched his penis, and then pushed her out the window when his mother came home and threatened to beat her up if she said anything about the incident was sufficient to show forcible lewd act, so as to make evidence of the incident admissible in subsequent dating a minor in california for capital murder as evidence of a criminal act involving the use or attempted use of force or violence or the threat of force or violence.
Wilkerson App. Stark App. Austin App. The legal definition of duress, as would support a conviction of aggravated lewd acts on a child under 14, is objective in nature and not dependent on the response exhibited by a particular victim.
Filing a afterellen online dating like this is a very expensive and time-consuming process, not to mention emotionally draining.
Citron can only think of three or four reported interracial dating south africa in America, where victims have successfully been awarded a monetary judgment against their online harassers. A public dating a minor in california case can also bring unwanted attention to the situation. Where victims have had a modicum more success dating a minor in california the civil sphere, is by threatening to sue, or even actually suing, for copyright violation if a website is displaying photos that were originally taken by the victim.
Self-taken photos—nude or not—are owned by the photographer unless otherwise assigned, so a website displaying those photos without consent is violating copyright.
In the world of criminal law, federal cyber-stalking lawsin place sinceinclude language xalifornia prosecutors to go after people using electronic tools to harass. Citron said approximately half of the states in the U.
So in states with specific cyber stalking and harassment laws like California, Illinois, and Massachusetts, theoretically victims can press criminal charges against their online stalkers and harassers. But for those living in a state without these laws, there is little other recourse. He was charged dating a minor in california three offenses, including Aggravated Harassment in the Second Degree.
With respect to the charge of aggravated harassment, the offense requires the defendant to have communicated with the victim, either anonymously or otherwise, through telephone, telegraph, mail, or any other form of written communication.
Since Barber did not send the photos to his girlfriend, the judge concluded he could not be held responsible under this section of the penal code.
But it can be hard to rewrite laws over and over as technology changes. Some states have already criminalized the distribution of dating a minor in california images.
Citron wrote in Slate that New Jersey was the first to make it a criminal invasion of privacy to disclose sexual images without consent in The age of the average Ethiopian dating african american player is between 28 and 29but the game has an absolutely massive underage community.
Wilton said he was introduced to the wider Minecraft community by a Los Angeles-based Minecraft player named Dana Iniguez in Iniguez and her husband, Manuel, set up the server for the NF Family Foundationa charity they started to support families dealing with neurofibromatosis.
Iniguez said she noticed Wilton had a close relationship with then—year-old Paige the Panda. Iniguez said the girl began messaging her about how she had romantic feelings toward Wilton.
The last time Iniguez and Wilton spoke was March She said it was during one of their final dating a minor in california that she began feeling concerned enough to file a formal complaint — which BuzzFeed News has seen — with the FBI in August Steel and her daughter play in a Minecraft group with other kids.
She told BuzzFeed News that in Satinga member of her Minecraft crew told her that Wilton had asked them repeatedly for nude photos. The controversy at the time made Dating a minor in california remember a group video call he was in with Wilton from the previous spring. At the time, Datnig, Hagan, and Broadbent were of age, but Coniglio was Guggenbiller said that Wilton started sending suggestive messages to Coniglio, the youngest of the group.
Wilton denied that he ever sent sexually vampire diaries dating timeline messages to Coniglio, saying that the Skype call was im. The whole evening felt weird enough that Guggenbiller said he decided to take screenshots, which were provided to BuzzFeed News, and hold datibg to them. On the evening of June 12,Wilton allegedly messaged two children, asking them for nude photographs.
One of them was year-old Stephen Cheenks. Cheenks declined to comment for this story, wanting minro move past his experiences with Wilton. Wilton denied ever paying Cheenks for nude photographs and said the money was for mjnor design work. Wilton allegedly sent messages that same night to a year-old, Chantelle Wiseman. The Wiseman family, originally from the UK, live in a small town in Belgium. Then Wiseman asked Wilton to verify that it was actually him. She asked him what kind of fan art Chantelle dating a minor in california sent him previously.
He said he thought he remembered that it was a lion. As he was talking to Wiseman on Skype, however, Wilton allegedly direct messaged Chantelle on her Twitter account. Then, Wiseman said, Wilton allegedly asked Chantelle for nude photos of herself — not realizing dating a minor in california was her worst online dating websites he was talking to on both accounts.
Afterwards, Wilton tweeted that his Twitter was hacked.
minoor Robyn Byrd thought her plan was working when the letter from her hero arrived in the mail. Soon, she said, dating a minor in california began receiving boxes of toys and art supplies from year-old Kricfalusi, better known as John K. He helped her get her first AOL account, through which he convinced her he could help her become a great artist. He visited her at the trailer park where she lived in Tucson, Arizona.
And then, when she was still in 11th grade, he flew her to Los Angeles to show her his studio and talk about her future. She was After finishing her senior year in Tucson, the tiny, dark-haired girl moved in with Kricfalusi permanently at age She told herself that Kricfalusi was helping to launch ninor career; in the end, she fled animation to get away from him. Since October, dating a minor in california national reckoning with sexual assault and harassment has not only felled dozens of prominent menbut also caused allegations made in the past to resurface.
In some ways, the old transgressions dating a minor in california the most uncomfortable: They implicate not just the alleged abusers, but everyone job dating toulouse 2014 knew about the stories and chose to overlook them. Tony Mora, an art director at Warner Bros. The male artists said stories of how Kricfalusi sexually harassed female artists, including teenage girls, were known through the industry.
Moreover, Kricfalusi made his fixation on teenage girls plainly obvious in single mom online dating profile art, datong as he worked on animated projects for the likes of Cartoon Network, Fox Kids, and Adult Swim.
And yet Kricfalusi, 62, continues to be widely celebrated as a pioneer in the male-dominated field of animation. His output has slowed down, but he enjoys a living-legend stature that prompted 3, people to fund a Kickstarter campaign for his short Cans Without Labelswhich he screened at a prestigious animation film festival in Until the publication of this story, his portrait hung on the wall at Nickelodeon.
Kricfalusi, especially after losing Ren and Stimpyhis most prized creation. For creative dating profile descriptions brief time, z years ago, he had a year-old girlfriend.
Over the years Free older man dating site struggled with datint were eventually diagnosed mental illnesses in To that point, for nearly three decades he had relied primarily on alcohol to self-medicate.
Dating a minor in california that time he has worked feverishly on rating mental health issues, and has been successful in stabilizing his life over the last decade. Similar califrnia California Penal Code section See the similar provisions in jn federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, section e.
These code sections define the specific crime of identity californla, require the law enforcement agency in the victim's area to take a police report, allow a victim to get an expedited judicial ruling of factual innocence, require the Department of Justice to establish a database of identity theft victims accessible by law enforcement and victims, and require financial dating a minor in california to release information and evidence related to identity theft to a victim with a police report or to the victim's law enforcement representative.
The sections establish penalties for the crime, including enhanced penalties for several groups 1 those with previous identity theft convictions, 2 those acquiring or possession personal information of 10 or more people, and 3 those who sell or otherwise convey personal information with craigslist chicago dating that it will be used to commit identity theft. This law also makes it a misdemeanor for any unauthorized person to obtain or assist another person in obtaining a dating a minor in california license, identification card, vehicle registration certificate, or other official document issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles, with the knowledge that the person obtaining the document is not entitled to it.
This law helps victims clear their records when an identity thief is arrested using dating a minor in california victim's name. It establishes a procedure californoa a victim to contest a charge by submitting a thumbprint for comparison with the thumbprint taken at the time of arrest. This dating a minor in california authorizes courts to award restitution for expenses of monitoring an identity theft victim's credit report and for the costs to repair the victim's credit datong a period of time reasonably necessary to make the victim whole, as specified.
This law protects identity theft victims who are being pursued for collection of debts which have been created by identity thieves. The law gives identity theft victims the right to bring an action against a claimant who is seeking payment on a debt NOT owed by the identity theft victim. The identity theft victim may seek an injunction against the claimant, plus actual damages, costs, a civil penalty, and other relief.
Search Warrant - California Penal Code section This law helps dating a minor in california enforcement in investigating identity theft cases by permitting a magistrate in the victim's county of residence to issue a search warrant for persons or property located in another county when the warrant is related to the identity theft.
Statute of Limitations - California Penal Code section This bill gives victims, law enforcement, and prosecutors a reasonable opportunity to discover and investigate the crime of identity theft by specifying that the statute of limitations for the crime and publicly filing a false or forged document commences when the crime was discovered, instead of when online dating rules for ladies was committed.
This law prohibits "phishing," the act of posing as a legitimate company or government agency in an email, Web page, or other Internet communication in order to trick a recipient into revealing his or her personal information.
This law prohibits an unauthorized person from knowingly installing or providing software that hillbilly dating profiles certain functions, such as taking control of the computer or collecting personally identifiable information, on or to another user's computer located in California. Cyberbullying - California Education Code section This law defines bullying as one or more acts of sexual harassment, hate violence, or intentional harassment, threats, or intimidation, directed against dating a minor in california district personnel or pupils, committed by a pupil or group of pupils.
Bullying, including bullying committed by means of an electronic act, as defined, including a post on a social network Internet Web dating a minor in california, is a ground on which suspension or expulsion may be based.
Cyber Exploitation - California Penal Code dating a minor in california Cyber Sexual Bullying Education Code sections The law also requires the California Department of Education to include information specifically about cyber sexual bullying on a dedicated website. This law prohibits an dating a minor in california of a website or online service directed to minors California residents under 18 from marketing to minors products or services that the minors adting legally prohibited from buying.
This law takes effect July 1, This law applies to state government agencies.
When collecting personal information electronically, agencies must provide certain notices. Before sharing an individual's information with dating a minor in california parties, agencies must obtain the individual's written consent.
This law prohibits posting or displaying on the Internet the home address or telephone number of any elected or appointed official, as defined, if the official has made a written demand not to disclose his or her information.
News:Long Beach Airport LGB, Donald Douglas Dr. Long Beach, CA | Copyright - Long Beach Airport, All Rights Reserved.
Leave a Comment